## Bleu Assessment — Technical clarity in 1–3 weeks For teams that know something is off and want a clear read before committing to the wrong fix. When something is off but the fix isn’t obvious: Teams usually arrive mid-symptom: velocity dropped, an area nobody wants to touch, a rebuild that keeps being proposed. Before committing to any of it, the problem needs an honest diagnosis. A technical and product read on what’s going on, what is causing drag, and what the cleanest next step is. - A diagnosis, not a proposal - Direct read of code, architecture, and process - A recommendation you can act on — with or without us - Investment: Scoped in the first conversation. - Length: Typical length: 1–3 weeks What an Assessment covers: - Where the drag is actually coming from - Architecture and code health around the problem area - What’s worth fixing, rebuilding, or leaving alone - Scope, tradeoffs, and sequencing for the next step - A clear recommendation before you commit to the wrong fix Selected work: - [CoW Protocol](https://bleu.builders/cases/cow-protocol): CoW offloaded high-context ecosystem work — SDKs, tooling, governance, user-facing product — so the core team stayed focused on the protocol. - [Silo Finance](https://bleu.builders/cases/silo-finance): The entire data layer owned end to end — subgraphs, multichain APIs across 4+ chains — with infrastructure costs cut 80%. Contact: [jose@bleu.builders](mailto:jose@bleu.builders)